Reference review / Local processing
Citation & identifier workbench
Review a reference-manager export, compare explicit identifiers, and keep source disagreements visible. Files and pasted text stay in this page’s memory. The tool does not look up references, verify publications, or merge records.
Supported subset and a worked example
RIS needs explicit TY/ER record boundaries and keeps author names literal. Its ambiguous SN field is preserved without guessing ISBN versus ISSN. CSL JSON preserves supported structured names and date precision; duplicate object keys are rejected. BibTeX accepts article, book, and misc entries with balanced fields. Macros, concatenation, inherited crossrefs, duplicate fields, and preambles are rejected; TeX text is never evaluated.
The worked example contains two synthetic sources with the same DOI spelling under conservative comparison, but different titles and years. Keep both sources separate, build the exports, and compare the warnings and source mapping. The example does not refer to a verified real publication.
To connect this review to the Evidence Manifest, add the original bibliography, a selected projection, and the review JSON as three separate local file sources. Record which source observations support a statement, preserve the originals, and use the checksum verifier for a later comparison.
For an actual research question, export the manifest and use Verify a saved manifest to compare the local copies you plan to cite. Keep unresolved title, date, identifier, and passage questions in your notes. A matched file and a reviewed citation do not determine what a reference discloses. Prior-art research can develop the search and a comparison supported by the sources. Start with a nonconfidential inquiry; agree the engagement and an appropriate exchange method before sharing detailed invention or client materials.